AML
Anti-Money Laundering: the framework of laws, controls and operational measures used to prevent, detect and report money laundering and related financial crime.
A practical reference for Financial Crime, AML, KYC, monitoring, investigations, data, crypto and AI terminology — including modern fraud threat vectors, model governance and regulatory control concepts. Definitions are concise and intended for advisory context rather than as substitutes for jurisdiction-specific legal definitions.
50 terms
Anti-Money Laundering: the framework of laws, controls and operational measures used to prevent, detect and report money laundering and related financial crime.
Customer Due Diligence: measures used to identify and understand a customer, relevant ownership and the nature of the relationship.
Enhanced Due Diligence: additional scrutiny applied where customer, product, geography, ownership or activity presents higher risk.
Ongoing Due Diligence: continuing review of customer information, risk and activity through the life of the relationship.
Know Your Customer: the operational processes used to establish and maintain sufficient understanding of a customer.
Know Your Business: due diligence focused on legal entities, business activity, ownership and control.
Ultimate Beneficial Owner: the natural person or persons who ultimately own or control a legal entity or arrangement.
Politically Exposed Person: a person entrusted with a prominent public function, whose position may create higher exposure to bribery or corruption risk.
Relative or Close Associate: a family member or close associate of a PEP who may require enhanced treatment under applicable rules or policy.
A PEP who holds or held a prominent public function domestically.
A PEP who holds or held a prominent public function in another country.
A person entrusted with a prominent function by an international organisation.
A documented assessment of the Financial Crime risks to which the business is exposed, used to inform proportionate policies, controls, procedures, resource allocation and customer-risk treatment. In UK AML regulation, relevant persons must identify and assess money-laundering and terrorist-financing risks and keep the assessment current and documented.
Reference: FCA Financial Crime Guide · FCA risk-assessment findings
The structured assessment of risk factors used to determine the customer’s Financial Crime risk profile and control treatment.
Relevant negative information from credible public sources that may indicate Financial Crime, misconduct or heightened customer risk.
The process of comparing customers, counterparties, transactions or other relevant data against sanctions and restriction lists.
Screening of names and identifiers against sanctions, PEP, watchlist or other risk datasets.
Rules, scenarios, analytics or models used to identify transactional behaviour that may require investigation.
A defined detection logic intended to identify a particular risk pattern, behaviour or typology.
A recurring method or pattern through which Financial Crime may be committed or concealed.
A system-generated or manually generated signal that requires review because defined risk criteria have been met.
An alert or match that appears potentially relevant but is determined not to represent the risk originally indicated.
Relevant suspicious or risky activity that a monitoring, screening or analytical control fails to identify or alert on.
Reference: DNB — From recovery to balance
The structured review of information and evidence to determine whether activity is explainable, suspicious or requires escalation.
Independent or secondary review used to assess whether cases, decisions or controls meet defined quality standards.
Suspicious Activity Report / Suspicious Transaction Report: a report to the competent authority when legal or regulatory suspicion thresholds are met.
Money Laundering Reporting Officer: the senior role responsible for relevant AML governance and, in many jurisdictions, decisions on suspicious-activity escalation and reporting.
A banking relationship in which one institution provides services to another financial institution, often creating complex cross-border Financial Crime risks.
Indirect access to a correspondent account by another financial institution through the direct respondent bank.
An account arrangement that may allow customers of a respondent institution to transact more directly through a correspondent relationship.
The use of trade transactions to disguise proceeds of crime and move value, including through misrepresentation of the price, quantity or quality of imports or exports.
Reference: FATF — Trade-Based Money Laundering
A person or account used to receive, move or transfer illicit funds, sometimes knowingly and sometimes through deception or coercion.
Fraud in which an identity is constructed from real and/or fabricated information and used to obtain accounts, credit, services or other financial benefit.
Reference: Federal Reserve Financial Services
Fraud or impersonation using AI-generated or manipulated voice, image or video to misrepresent identity, defeat authentication, or facilitate onboarding, account access or social-engineering attacks.
Reference: UK Fraud Strategy 2026–2029
Virtual Asset Service Provider: an entity providing specified virtual-asset services such as exchange, transfer or custody.
The FATF standard requiring relevant virtual-asset transfers to be accompanied by specified originator and beneficiary information, with jurisdiction-specific implementation. In the EU, Regulation (EU) 2023/1113 applies equivalent information requirements to in-scope crypto-asset transfers.
Reference: FATF — 2026 VA/VASP implementation update · EUR-Lex — Regulation (EU) 2023/1113
Money-laundering or related Financial Crime risk arising from cryptocurrency, digital-asset products, providers, channels or typologies.
Analytical techniques and tools used to examine public blockchain activity and identify addresses, flows or risk indicators.
The documented path showing where data originated, how it moved and how it was transformed.
A control comparing data sets or flows to identify missing, duplicated, altered or otherwise inconsistent records.
Testing designed to determine whether a control is appropriately designed and operating as intended.
An operating approach that uses material changes and events to trigger customer review rather than relying only on fixed periodic refresh cycles.
A governance approach to AI and machine learning in Financial Crime that combines effective risk coverage with accountability, human oversight, reliable data, explainability, fairness, validation and ongoing performance monitoring.
Reference: DNB — From recovery to balance · NVB — Models in Alert and Event Generation
The framework of ownership, accountability, approval, validation, performance monitoring, change control and risk acceptance applied across a model’s lifecycle.
Reference: NVB — Models in Alert and Event Generation · NIST AI Risk Management Framework
Controlled documentation of a model’s purpose, source data and data quality, preprocessing, design, validation, stability and performance, explainability, limitations, implementation and production monitoring.
Reference: NVB — Technical Model Documentation
Independent or appropriately segregated assessment of whether a model’s design, data, implementation and performance are suitable for its intended Financial Crime purpose and whether material limitations are understood and controlled.
Reference: NVB — Models in Alert and Event Generation · NVB — Technical Model Documentation
Systemic, computational/statistical or human-cognitive bias that can influence AI outputs and create unfair or distorted treatment. In Financial Crime use cases, harmful bias should be identified and managed across the AI lifecycle.
Reference: NIST — Managing harmful bias in AI · DNB — From recovery to balance
A deterioration or change in model behaviour because data, patterns, environments or relationships have changed over time.
AI whose outputs can be accompanied by reasons or evidence that are meaningful to relevant users and appropriately reflect the process that produced the result. In Financial Crime controls, explainability supports challenge, governance and evidencing of AI-assisted decisions.
Reference: NIST — Four Principles of Explainable AI
An operating design in which accountable human judgement, review or approval remains embedded in automated or AI-supported Financial Crime decisions, including escalation or override where the consequence or uncertainty requires it.
Reference: DNB — From recovery to balance · NVB — Technical Model Documentation
Jurisdiction-specific definitions should always be checked against the applicable law, regulator and institutional policy. Useful source families include FATF, national regulators, FIUs and official corporate-registry guidance.
International standards, recommendations, guidance and Financial Crime terminology.
fatf-gafi.org →UK regulatory material, including Financial Crime guidance and handbook provisions.
FCA Financial Crime Guide →